Weekend Edition

stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

Saint Lucia Kings fall short in CPL Qualifier

The Saint Lucia Kings stumbled at the first hurdle of the 2025 Republic Bank Caribbean Premier League (CPL) playoffs, falling to the Guyana Amazon Warriors by 14 runs in Qualifier 1 at Providence on September 17. Despite flashes of brilliance, the defending champions were unable to chase down a competitive total, setting up a do-or-die clash against the Trinbago Knight Riders in Qualifier 2 on September 19. 

Bowling first at Providence Stadium, the Kings made early inroads, restricting the Amazon Warriors to 45-1 in the powerplay. The Boys in Blue continued to apply pressure, taking wickets at regular intervals. At the 15-over mark, Guyana was precariously placed at 107-5. However, late-order cameos from Romario Shepherd (21 off 11) and Dwaine Pretorius (17 off 7), combined with a steady 32-run anchor from Shai Hope, lifted the home side to a respectable 157-7 after 20 overs. 

In response, the Kings’ chase got off to a rocky start, losing Tim Seifert and Johnson Charles within the first two overs. At 37-3 after the powerplay, the innings lacked momentum and stability. A flurry of wickets followed, leaving the middle order scrambling. In a surprising twist, Khary Pierre almost emerged as the batting savior, smashing 50 off 29 balls to reignite hope. A late surge from new man Tymal Mills (30 off 14) brought the game down to the final over, but the Kings ultimately fell short. 

The Kings’ CPL title retention hopes remain alive, however. They will regroup ahead of the September 19 Qualifier 2 against the Trinbago Knight Riders. A win there would secure their spot in the grand final and allow a chance to rewrite the narrative.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

112
Immigration

Will you be affected by the US visa freeze?

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.