ABC News:-President-elect Donald Trump suggested today in a tweet that burning the American flag should result in “loss of citizenship or year in jail.”
Flag burning is legal in the U.S., protected by the First Amendment.
The U.S. Supreme Court in 1989 ruled that burning the flag as a form of “symbolic speech” is a constitutional right. The narrow 5-4 decision came in a case involving Gregory Joey Johnson who, outside the 1984 Republican National Convention, burned the flag to protest the policies of then-President Ronald Reagan.
Following Trump’s tweet, the spokesman for the president-elect’s transition team was asked about the issue on CNN.
“Flag-burning should be illegal,” Miller said on CNN when asked about Trump’s tweet. “The president-elect is a very strong supporter of the First Amendment, but there’s a big difference between that and burning the American flag,” Miller said.
It wasn’t clear what prompted Trump’s tweet on the issue. But it came after a group of military veterans and others protested this weekend at Hampshire College in western Massachusetts against a decision by the school to temporarily stop flying the U.S. flag after students allegedly burned a flag in protest of Trump’s election.
Flag-burning was at times used as a form of protest against Trump during his presidential campaign, including by Johnson, who was among 17 demonstrators arrested in Cleveland this July during the Republican National Convention.
Johnson spoke to ABC News last month on the broader topics of protest and Trump, then a presidential candidate, after Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg criticized San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick for kneeling during pregame performances of the national anthem in what the football player said is a protest against the treatment of blacks in the U.S. Ginsburg later expressed regret for criticizing Kaepernick’s protest.
“Today in the U.S., it’s the same flag and the nationalistic chauvinism is even worse,” Johnson told ABC News in the interview, referring to his role in the Supreme Court‘s 1989 case.