Security Company responds

A Security Company  here has  said that it did everything it could in the matter concerning the burglary, rape and homicide at Marisule.

The company was responding to public comments.

A spokesperson for the company told the Times that it did not receive a burglary signal from the home of the deceased,  76 year old Rose Anne Raymond since the alarm system at the home was not armed.

The company official said  its staff were first on the scene, alerted the family  and summoned the police.

Police  reported receiving a report reference to a homicide at Marisule, about 10:30 p.m. on Saturday, December 10, 2016.

The body of the deceased was discovered at her residence.

She was later conveyed to the Victoria Hospital, where she was pronounced dead by a medical practitioner.



  1. Mi soaps
    December 12, 2016 at 8:45 pm

    If they did not recieve a alarm call, then why were they the first on the scene? Does not make sense to me.

    1. Anonymous
      December 12, 2016 at 11:16 pm


  2. Anonymous
    December 12, 2016 at 8:56 pm


  3. Anonymous
    December 12, 2016 at 9:49 pm

    Police should treat them as suspects.

  4. Me
    December 12, 2016 at 9:59 pm

    I am more confused now than I was prior to reading this. What a way to clear the company’s name. If no alarm went off as the unit was not armed, how and why were they first on the scene? Were they acting on suspicion/tip? Mwe pas copwan.

  5. Castries E
    December 12, 2016 at 10:15 pm

    Very confusing account of events by this company! This company clearly has exposed itself either as incompetent communicators or as a possible suspect

  6. Anonymous
    December 12, 2016 at 10:41 pm

    What security company is this? Why are they first on the scene if they did not receive an alarm. They just randomly show up to clients homes?

  7. Anonymous
    December 12, 2016 at 10:56 pm

    AA.. Security company.. You know yall are in trouble right?

  8. Anonymous
    December 13, 2016 at 4:37 am

    Even in respònding to the comments the SC has shown its incompetent by indicating that they received no burgular alarm but they were the first to arrive at the crime scene and subsequently contacted the family and the Police. What were they doing there if there was no alarm received?

  9. Agnes Guidry
    December 13, 2016 at 6:36 am

    I totally agree. Please investigate this Security company and treat them as the prime suspect.
    In their own words they said they were the first on the scene, but DID NOT receive an alarm call. WHY were they @ the lady’s house?

  10. Anonymous
    December 13, 2016 at 2:41 pm

    Eh beh Bon

  11. Anonymous
    December 13, 2016 at 6:43 pm

    Ok folks looks like the communication system really bad. Lol.Although that’s not a laughing mater.
    Based on what I am reading and my “limited” contact with the way this thing operates, this is how I think it is done.

    If the client normally arms their system by a certain time and when monitoring the company realises it has nor been armed, the try to con act the client, or #’s they have till they get a response.
    If the dont get one their people ate dispatched to the clients location to see what’s going on.
    Maybe they did do their job, but did not pass on the information to the media properly lol.
    A a I better apply for the Press Release job

    But on a more serious note, something is not right here. This is terrible what happened.

  12. LB
    December 14, 2016 at 6:31 pm

    This is a very badly written press release … no wonder, no one understands what transpired between the security company, the deceased relatives and the police. Bad communication is a terrible thing.