Sandals seeks to clarify $24 million withholding tax controversy

(Press Release) – Sandals Resorts International (SRI) is grateful to the Government of Saint Lucia for bringing closure to a long-standing tax dispute in respect of withholding taxes assessed by the Inland Revenue Department on Insurance costs allocated to its three resort companies between 2001 and 2009.

We want to make it abundantly clear that this is not money that the company owed or that was outstanding, as has been confirmed in a statement by Minister in the Ministry for Finance, Senator The Honourable Dr. Ubaldus Raymond.

SRI objected to these assessments in accordance with its statutory rights under the Income Tax Act, and has consistently maintained, in correspondence and discussions with Inland Revenue and the Ministry of Finance, that the assessments are not justified, and should be withdrawn. SRI’s objections were based on professional advice and a legal ruling by the OECS Supreme Court that is relevant to withholding tax assessments in Saint Lucia.

The total amount claimed by Inland Revenue is $24.4 million, but this includes $15 million of penalties and interest, as the assessments date back to 2001. If SRI had accepted that there was a legal basis for these assessments, the companies would have been able to have 100% of the interest and penalties waived under the income tax amnesty in effect, since October 2016.

As SRI did not accept that there was a legal basis for these assessments, it was prepared to use its statutory rights to appeal to the Income Tax Commissioners or the Courts to have the assessments withdrawn.

The insurance costs allocated to the three resort companies in Saint Lucia represent their share of comprehensive insurance coverage for the Sandals Group of Hotels in the Caribbean.

Due to the sheer magnitude of the risks insured, SRI is required to self-insure up to 20% of the coverage, with the balance covered by Lloyds. Between 2001 and 2009 the costs allocated to the companies in Saint Lucia amounted to $37.7 million, and Inland Revenue sought to impose withholding tax of 25% on these costs. This tax would have increased the cost of SRI’s insurance in Saint Lucia by 25%, with no tax benefit locally.

The evidence was presented to and accepted by the previous administration, which had committed to working with us to have it resolved, and for which we have been waiting for several years.

SRI’s ability to obtain good insurance coverage at an affordable cost ensures that its properties can recover quickly from hurricanes and storms such as they are about to experience in Antigua, Turks & Caicos and the Bahamas.

This ensures continuity of operations for employees, visitors and the destination. SRI was therefore able to obtain an exemption from withholding tax on insurance premiums from 2009 under the Tourism Stimulus and Investment Act in 2014. Other companies were entitled to request similar incentives.

The Sandals companies in Saint Lucia are fully compliant with all taxes, statutory deductions and payments. We have a robust Corporate Social Responsibility programme, good employee benefits, and voluntarily contribute payments of US$2.00 per person per night to the Tourism Investment Fund.

The dispute with Inland Revenue over withholding taxes on insurance premiums is an old and exceptional matter that required resolution if SRI was to be able to finance new investments in Saint Lucia. We urge the Government to address the issue of withholding and other taxes on critical inputs to the tourism industry for all stakeholders, so that we can work together to grow the economy.

5 Comments

  1. Anonymous
    September 6, 2017 at 5:45 pm Reply

    We the people of St. Lucia are suffering due to the current state of the economy and we cannot afford to have Companies who make millions upon millions and are reluctant to pay taxes in return, you have a day before the Lord. This is highway robbery.

  2. Anonymous
    September 6, 2017 at 6:27 pm Reply

    Blah! Blah!Blah!…….One Day sandals going to pay!

  3. Non-Voter
    September 7, 2017 at 9:12 am Reply

    Was this written in English? Can anyone translate

    1. Jnpierre
      September 7, 2017 at 10:23 am Reply

      It means if you know your have to pay 20% tax on your salary, according to the law, and Inland Revenue suddenly tells you you have to pay 25%, wont you object to the additional 5% they demanding?

  4. babengz
    October 10, 2017 at 2:51 am Reply

    If there are any traders here I want to let you in on a great system for trading I’ve found for the oil futures. Check out Code Trading System, I went from a beginner to profitable in my first month. Oil trading is the best way better than the Forex or stocks. Google Code Traders to learn more.

Leave a Reply

Shares