Sunday, September 22, 2019

Judges Rule UK Parliament Suspension Unlawful

SourceBBC NEWS

Must Read

Endurance Athlete Completes Historic Barbados To Saint Lucia Swim

Press Release:- On Friday, September 13th, 2019 at 8:20 AM with a crowd standing on the beach, Cameron Bellamy...

Update On Visiting Hospital Ship

Press Release:- The United States Naval Ship Comfort Medical Humanitarian Mission is expected to commence on Wednesday, September 25 to...

Public Invited To Voice Concerns At RSS Panel Discussion

Press Release:- A unique opportunity has been presented to the public and they are being   called on to engage...
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Boris Johnson’s suspension of the UK Parliament is unlawful, Scotland’s highest civil court has ruled.

A panel of three judges at the Court of Session found in favour of a cross-party group of politicians who were challenging the prime minister’s move.

The judges said the PM was attempting to prevent parliament holding the government to account ahead of Brexit.

A UK government appeal against the ruling will be heard by the Supreme Court in London next week.

The Court of Session decision overturns an earlier ruling from the court, which said last week that Mr Johnson had not broken the law.

The current five week suspension of Parliament, a process known as proroguing, started in the early hours of Tuesday.

MPs are not scheduled to return to Parliament until 14 October, when there will be a Queen’s Speech outlining Mr Johnson’s legislative plans. The UK is due to leave the EU on 31 October.

Opposition parties have called for Parliament to be immediately recalled in the wake of the court judgement, but Downing Street said this would not happen ahead of the Supreme Court’s ruling on the case.

Downing Street also distanced itself from reports that quoted Number 10 sources as suggesting the Scottish judges were politically biased, and insisted that the prime minister has “absolute respect” for the independence of the judiciary.

Mr Johnson had previously insisted that it was normal practice for a new government to prorogue Parliament, and that it was “nonsense” to suggest he was attempting to undermine democracy.

But the Court of Session judges were unanimous in finding that Mr Johnson was motivated by the “improper purpose of stymieing Parliament”, and he had effectively misled the Queen in advising her to suspend Parliament.

They added: “The Court will accordingly make an Order declaring that the prime minister’s advice to HM the Queen and the prorogation which followed thereon was unlawful and is thus null and of no effect.”

The group of more than 70 largely pro-Remain MPs and peers behind the legal challenge were headed by SNP MP Joanna Cherry, who said they felt “utterly vindicated”.

The parliamentarians appealed to the Inner House of the Court of Session after their original challenge to the suspension of Parliament was dismissed by judge Lord Doherty last week.

Lord Doherty said Mr Johnson had not broken the law by proroguing Parliament, and that it was for MPs and the electorate to judge the prime minister’s actions rather than the courts.

But the three Inner House judges said they disagreed with Lord Doherty’s ruling because this particular prorogation had been a “tactic to frustrate Parliament” rather than a legitimate use of the power.

ne of the three judges, Lord Brodie, said: “This was an egregious case of a clear failure to comply with generally accepted standards of behaviour of public authorities.

“It was to be inferred that the principal reasons for the prorogation were to prevent or impede Parliament holding the executive to account and legislating with regard to Brexit, and to allow the executive to pursue a policy of a no-deal Brexit without further Parliamentary interference.”

Lord Drummond Young said that the UK government had failed to show a valid reason for the prorogation, adding: “The circumstances, particularly the length of the prorogation, showed that the purpose was to prevent such scrutiny.

“The only inference that could be drawn was that the UK government and the prime minister wished to restrict Parliament.”

- Advertisement -

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Headlines

Debutants Impress With Bat And Ball As Tridents Crush Zouks

Press Release:- It was a tale of two Powerplays as Barbados Tridents gave their 2019 Hero Caribbean Premier League (CPL) playoff hopes a major boost...

Teenager Shot Dead

A teenager was shot dead in La Ressource, Dennery Friday night, law enforcement officials say. The deceased has been identified as Nicholas Jn Louis, 19. Police...

T&T Thrash Saint Lucia In Netball

By Terry Finisterre Saint Lucia were thrashed 52-13 by Trinidad and Tobago club Elbasan in the opening exchanges of the regional men's netball tournament, being...

Tourism Industry To Adopt New Action Plan

Press Release:- by Anicia Antoine, GIS The Ministry of Tourism in collaboration with The Travel Foundation have officially launched the ‘Low Carbon and Resource Efficient...

More Articles

Teenager Shot DeadRead
+ +