SLP Cites Lack Of ‘Significant’ Progress On John Compton Dam Rehabilitation

- Advertisement -

The opposition Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) has expressed concern over a lack of significant progress on the John Compton dam.

The concern was expressed in a press release Wednesday as Saint Lucians cope with a water related emergency, in force since May 18, 2020.

The following is the text of the SLP press release:

The Saint Lucia Labour Party is calling on the public to heed calls from the Water and
Sewerage Authority (WASCO) to be conservative in the use of water and to avoid wastage as Saint Lucia is still feeling the effects of drought conditions.

- Advertisement -

Notwithstanding its regard for WASCO’s appeals, the SLP continues to have concerns about the lack of significant progress with the John Compton Dam Rehabilitation project.

It must be remembered that the project was first launched in November 2015 with over $18 million dollars held in reserve from the special levy paid by consumers for that purpose.

Four years later there is no visible sign that the dredging of silt from the dam is near commencement.

The Party believes that the public deserves to be given assurances concerning the status of the Project as well as the operations of WASCO in order to have confidence that we are moving purposefully towards mitigating the vulnerability of the water sector.

It therefore calls upon WASCO to answer the following questions in order to prove that ongoing activities at the Dam Rehabilitation Project match the boast of achievements from some government Ministers but which do not seem to be reflected in progress on the ground.

1. What is the true status of the John Compton Dam Rehabilitation project?
2. Why was the initial bidding process aborted and followed by a delay of one year before a new process was initiated?
3. How much of the capacity of the dam has been lost to silt as of today? Is it true that currently silt occupies over 60% of the capacity of the dam?
4. Why has the dredging of silt not started two (2) years after the engagement of contractors?
5. Why are Starter Dykes, to accommodate the dredged material from the dam, not constructed two (2) years after Mega Contracting Inc. was contracted to undertake those works?
6. Does Mega Contracting Inc. have the required capacity to undertake those works?
Information provided by Wasco in a press release in mid-September 2016, stated that: “…the John Compton Dam Rehabilitation Project is actively ongoing with requests for proposals being sought.”

The release stated further: “These can be found on the Government and Caribbean Development Bank’s websites, the Government Gazette and the Voice Newspaper.

Deadline for submission of these to the Central Tenders Board is Friday 23rd September, 2016.” It means then that WASCO is best placed to explain the following:

⦁ Why was the sole pre-qualifying company, CIE Limited, not invited to submit a bid?
⦁ Why did it invite Mega Contracting Inc. and Saiwak Construction and Heavy Equipment Rentals to submit documents for prequalification AFTER the deadline had passed and even then they did not meet tendering requirements?

⦁ Was WASCO aware of an alleged direct relation between Mega Contracting Inc. and a Government Minister and that consequently a possible conflict of interest may have arisen?

- Advertisement -
Editorial Staff
Editorial Staff
Our Editorial Staff at St. Lucia Times is a team publishing news and other articles to over 200,000 regular monthly readers in Saint Lucia and in over 150 other countries worldwide.


Comments are closed.


Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Send this to a friend