The National Workers Union (NWU) has firmly rejected the government’s proposed 13 per cent wage increase for 2022-2028, demanding that the Government Negotiating Team (GNT) re-engage in discussions to reach an agreement.
It says no deal has been reached yet, and it will not tolerate any disregard for proper negotiation processes.
Junior Industrial Relations Specialist Embert Eugene clarified the NWU’s position to clear up confusion among members, following Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre’s announcement earlier this month of the salary increase for public sector workers.
“It was a challenge for us because many members were calling and questioning how we could accept a 13 per cent increase without consulting them. We have clarified this with our shop stewards and members that the NWU has not accepted the proposal and remains committed to negotiating on their behalf,” Eugene stated.
He noted that wage increases are only one aspect of the union’s concerns. Members are also seeking adjustments to fringe benefits, allowances, and insurance coverage. These include uniform, risk, and meal allowances, as well as insurance for workers involved in high-risk duties.
“We are negotiating a holistic package that goes beyond wages to ensure our members are adequately supported,” Eugene explained.
In a letter dated December 27, 2024, addressed to GNT Chairman Verne Gill, the NWU reminded the government of the agreed negotiation framework.
It expressed dissatisfaction with public announcements about the proposed increase, which it described as disrespectful and inconsistent with the established process.
The NWU has given the GNT 14 days to re-engage in negotiations.
“We cannot and will not accept any disregard or disrespect in the course of our negotiations,” the letter stated, demanding immediate corrective action to move discussions forward.
The NWU is the latest staff representative organisation to publicly state that negotiations have not concluded.
The Police Welfare Association and the Correctional Services Welfare Association, like the NWU, have stated that, in addition to salaries, fringe benefits are also on their agenda.
During his end-of-year press conference in December, Prime Minister Pierre stated that the planned wage increase followed the finalisation of negotiations with public sector unions. He also announced that tax-free back pay would be issued in February.
THe least productive want the most money. What a thing,
Where is the TUF leadership on this ……very interesting
The NWU’s rejection of the 13% wage proposal is absolutely justified. With inflation having eroded workers’ purchasing power year after year, this offer does little to address the real economic struggles faced by employees and their families. A 25% increase is not excessive—it’s necessary to ensure wages keep pace with the rising cost of living and provide workers with the financial stability they deserve.
Beyond wages, the NWU is right to demand better allowances and benefits. Risk coverage, uniforms, and meal allowances aren’t just perks—they’re essential for ensuring that workers are adequately supported in their roles, especially those facing high-risk or demanding conditions.
The government must recognize that workers are the backbone of this economy. Meeting their reasonable demands isn’t just fair; it’s an investment in the nation’s future. The NWU’s call for further negotiations is a principled stand, and I fully support their efforts to secure the fair treatment and compensation workers deserve.
Thank you 🙏
GNT And NWU…
Whatever is good and beneficial for everyone !!!!!
I really don’t understand why politicians, union reps, and others continually use inflammatory and contentious language in their statements. It is possible for them to say their piece without these language. For example, language such as “it will not tolerate any disregard for proper negotiation processes” or “We cannot and will not accept any disregard or disrespect in the course of our negotiations”.
In my estimation, these people (Politicians included) really need to get training in communications, so they do not come across as antagonistic.