Weekend Edition

stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Limited Prosecutions Force Anti-Gang Act Review

The Attorney General’s Chambers is currently reviewing the Anti-Gang Act with the aim of strengthening the legislation so it can serve as a more effective crime-fighting tool.

Despite being enacted with severe penalties, including fines up to EC$300,000 and prison terms of up to 20 years for gang leadership, the law has been notably underutilised since its inception.

The Royal Saint Lucia Police Force has consistently pointed to significant challenges in applying the legislation within its current framework, resulting in only a handful of cases being brought forward.

Speaking on the sidelines of Parliament on Tuesday, Attorney General Leslie Mondesir confirmed the matter is being actively addressed.

“As of now, we are looking at the old anti-gang legislation to review it and beefing it up, giving it more teeth so the police can apply that piece of legislation in the crime fighting efforts of the government,” Mondesir said.

The act was created to curb gang activity by criminalising behaviours such as membership, recruitment, aiding and abetting, or providing support to gangs. It also gives the courts tools to impose penalties such as fines, imprisonment, forfeiture of benefits. and consecutive sentencing. 

Convictions carry stiff penalties: gang membership or leadership can result in fines of up to EC$300,000 and prison terms of up to 20 years; aiding or abetting gang-related offences can lead to 10 years’ imprisonment and fines of up to EC$100,000; and committing or preparing to commit offences for the benefit of a gang carries similar penalties, with aggravating factors potentially increasing sentences.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Share via
Send this to a friend