Weekend Edition

stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Missing evidence found in Chacadan Daniel case, police chief says

Police Commissioner Verne Garde said Thursday that exhibits once believed to be missing in the murder investigation of 22-year-old Chacadan Daniel have been recovered.

Speaking at a press conference, Garde explained that the discovery came after a renewed search of the exhibit room at the Micoud Police Station.

“The primary investigator for that matter was on vacation, I reassigned the investigation to a more senior person, and they went over the file,” Garde said. “It was reported to me by a number of reports that the issue in the matter was the fact that the primary evidence was not available and it was missing. In fact, the initial report on the missing evidence went back as far as 2018, 2019.”

According to Garde, a formal investigation into the missing exhibits began in May 2023. He said that after multiple searches of the exhibit room, officers eventually retrieved the items.

“Subsequent to the receiving of the exhibits, I have given instructions to get some non-intimate samples of several of the police officers who worked at the station during that period,” Garde added. “We’ve submitted the exhibit itself to the lab and the lab will be cross-referencing the DNA with these non-intimate samples, because we want to be sure of exactly what transpired in that station on that day. The police in every station have a duty of care. So, we have to be very cautious when somebody dies in our custody.”

Verne Garde, Police Commissioner, Royal Saint Lucia Police Force

The announcement comes nearly two months after Garde disclosed that the noose central to the 2013 case had disappeared from police custody. Daniel was found hanging in a cell at the Micoud Police Station more than a decade ago. An inquest later ruled his death an unlawful killing, contradicting initial police claims that he had taken his own life.

For Daniel’s family, the case has been marked by years of anguish and frustration over delays in accountability.

On August 11, the family released a statement describing their pain as “without measure” and criticising both the police and the criminal justice system for what they called a lack of due process and transparency.

“It has been a long hard road,” the family said. “Every anniversary of his killing and even this recent news continues to be very emotional for his mother and his siblings. We persevere so that no other family has to go through a similar experience, as justice delayed is justice denied.” 

They also called for sweeping reforms, including stricter procedures for securing and accessing evidence, greater support for the public when seeking redress, and the creation of an independent body to handle complaints against police officers.

The family thanked Garde for disclosing details of the missing exhibits. 

They also stressed that Daniel’s death “is not a political issue”.

“It is a national issue which highlights the lack of due process, accountability, transparency and respect for human rights, particularly for marginalised communities.”

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.