Weekend Edition

stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

OECS seen as key to unlocking regional cannabis industry

Caribbean cannabis regulators say the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) could hold the key to breaking the patchwork of island laws and building a harmonised framework that supports trade, testing, and inclusion across the region.

While individual islands have rolled out their own systems — from Jamaica’s decade-old authority to Saint Lucia’s pending legislation — the regional regulators, at the 2nd Cannabliss cannabis conference held in St Vincent and the Grenadines, agreed that the region will struggle to compete globally without alignment. 

Saint Lucia’s cannabis regulator Dylan Norbert-Inglis put it plainly: “These steps really are the precursor to having such harmonised stances.”

A harmonised framework would allow Caribbean states to share testing facilities, smooth trade across borders, and ensure that traditional farmers and small cultivators can participate no matter where they live. Regulators said current laws are too fragmented, making it difficult to attract investment or build regional supply chains.

Norbert-Inglis, whose Regulated Substances Authority is overseeing Saint Lucia’s new cannabis regime, said collaboration has already started through the Caribbean Cannabis Forum, where authorities exchange notes on everything from pesticides to sacramental use. 

“Less than two years ago, we never knew each other… Now we have the Caribbean Cannabis Forum where we all work together to ensure we help one another,” he told the audience.

Barbados’ acting Barbados Medicinal Cannabis Licensing Authority (BMCLA) CEO Shanika Roberts-Odle said her country’s cautious approach reflects social realities. But even so, Roberts-Odle said harmonisation could help address the barriers that frustrate small players, such as high fees and security requirements. 

“The current state of our legislation does not allow for us to just give a license… Cabinet-level changes are required,” she said. A regional approach, she suggested, could open doors for farmers who cannot yet meet local requirements.

Jamaica, which pioneered cannabis reform in 2015, offers another case. 

Cannabis Licensing Authority CEO Farrah Blake admitted the island’s licensing process was once notorious for delays. But by embedding its Alternative Development programme for traditional farmers directly into regulations, Jamaica hopes to make inclusion permanent — a model other islands could adopt through OECS channels.

Beyond licensing, regulators stressed that harmonisation is essential for testing and export. Antigua’s Regis Burton warned that without common benchmarks, products cannot easily move from one island to another. 

St Vincent officials pointed to their investment in a modern laboratory that screens for pesticides, heavy metals, and terpenes. But one island’s lab cannot serve the region alone. An OECS-led network could make those services accessible to smaller states.

Rastafari representatives pressed regulators not to lose sight of social justice.

Emmanuel Alexander, of the Caribbean Cooperative Working Group, said: “We must have some regional conclusion… This is not a race. Regional conclusion in terms of this industry — we will do it together.” 

Another warned: “Don’t just settle for the free license… You’re fighting for something bigger.”

From financing to farmer inclusion, the message was clear: OECS coordination could give the region the scale and coherence it needs. As Norbert-Inglis summed up: “With these periods of positive action, we do see in the future that there will be some harmonisation.” – Tracy Moore

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.