Weekend Edition

stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Are our waste habits tarnishing the country’s beauty?

Roadside garbage and rivers choked with plastic are not the images that define Saint Lucia’s allure. Yet behind the lush greenery that draws thousands of visitors each year lies a quieter, persistent crisis — one of waste and neglect.

It’s a truth even Dr James Fletcher, Saint Lucia’s former Minister for Sustainable Development and current CARICOM Climate Envoy, finds difficult to ignore.

“Saint Lucia prides itself on being a tourism destination… And we do have stunning natural beauty but when you look at our roadsides, Saint Lucia is among the worst in the Caribbean,” Fletcher admitted frankly. “You’d be hard pressed to find many that are worse than we are when it comes to how much litter there is in plain sight, and the way people just indiscriminately litter.”

CARICOM Climate Envoy Dr James Fletcher says Saint Lucia must confront its litter crisis by changing how people think about waste. (Photo Credit: Jevon Murray)

Fletcher’s words cut deep, especially in a country that markets itself as The Helen of the West Indies — a name synonymous with beauty. But the litter scattered across verges, beaches, in and around rivers tells a different story.

The problem, he said, isn’t confined to the occasional tossed bottle or food container but extends to people dumping household garbage in places they assume go unseen. “They’ll take garbage from their homes and drop it at Pigeon Island where they figure nobody’s watching. We really need to do something about this — aesthetically, socially. We need to change the mindset of people.”

Fletcher warns that the costs of this behaviour stretch far beyond the island’s appearance. “A clean country is a healthy country,” he said, noting that plastic containers collect water and attract mosquitoes. Food waste draws rats. And when drains are blocked, heavy rainfall leads to flooding — damaging homes and destroying property.

A roadside in Saint Lucia littered with plastic bottles and food containers — a growing concern for both the environment and the island’s image. (Photo Credit: Jevon Murray)

He also pointed to the toll on marine life, which bears the brunt of pollution carried downstream. “The amount of plastic washing into our oceans is clogging coral reefs and mangroves,” he said. “Fish are now feeding on plastic. It’s frightening to think that one day we could have more plastic than fish in our oceans, and even more frightening to think of how much of that ends up in our own bodies.”

If there’s any cause for optimism, it may be found in the small but visible shifts in consumer behaviour. When Massy Stores introduced a charge for single-use plastic bags in 2018, the public response was heated. Many accused the supermarket chain of using environmentalism as a pretext to increase profits. But seven years later, the difference is visible.

According to Emlyn Jean, information and communications manager at the Saint Lucia Solid Waste Management Authority, Saint Lucia once had a noticeable problem with plastic bag litter, but that issue has since declined. She also links it to the possibility of plastic bags carrying greater value than they once did.

Photo Credit: Jevon Murray

Other businesses, including CPJ and M&C, have since implemented similar policies. Fletcher called the move by Massy “progressive” and “unsolicited,” noting that it showed leadership from the private sector rather than government. “It wasn’t just about charging for bags,” he said. “Massy also provided reusable ones. That combination really helped change behaviour. And the good thing is, you don’t have to buy their bags — you can bring your own.”

He believes the next logical step would be to phase out the sale of single-use plastic bags entirely. “The policy’s been in place long enough,” he said. “People are conditioned. It’s time to stop selling them.”

Government-led policies can also play a role. The Styrofoam and Plastics (Prohibition) Act, passed in 2019, appears to have eliminated styrofoam containers from circulation — an improvement Jean says that has been noticeable in recent years as far as waste is concerned. But she admits that single-use plastics, particularly water bottles and fast-food containers, continue to dominate the waste stream.

Reusable over disposable: Seven years after Massy Stores began charging for plastic bags, the shift in consumer behaviour is clear, proving that small policy changes can make a lasting difference. (Photo Credit: Jevon Murray)

 

Acknowledging the need for even more bans and better implemented environmental policies, Fletcher argues that while bans are necessary, they must be paired with affordable, accessible alternatives. “But when you ban items, you must give people something affordable to use. That’s where we can get creative — use banana stems or bamboo to make packaging. We have the raw material right here.”

He also once championed the Returnable Containers Bill during his time as minister. The bill, which would have allowed customers to return reusable containers to outlets for compensation, was first introduced long before his tenure in 2011 to 2016. And he says, while he pushed for its reintroduction, it never made it to law, but he believes it remains a viable and necessary policy tool.

Policy, education and public awareness are crucial, but changing behaviour — particularly among adults — remains the hardest but most essential. Fletcher believes that real progress can also mean changing how people think about and treat waste. Cleanup drives, he said, are necessary but shouldn’t become a national routine. “We keep doing these cleanups, but the way we stop having cleanups is by stopping people from throwing things down that need to be cleaned up.”

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.