The date for a general election in Saint Lucia has been announced. As expected, campaigning has intensified. But with that intensity, we’ve observed some disturbing trends that, if left unchecked, could tarnish Saint Lucia’s reputation for holding elections free of violence.
In recent days, and from reports – some substantiated – we’ve seen private property defaced with slogans and emblems of the two main political parties.
We’ve heard name-calling, both in person and on social media, and witnessed acts of intimidation by opposing supporters.
It is also rumoured that some of these confrontations have escalated from words to physical acts. While these incidents have not, to our knowledge, originated from any candidates themselves, we have yet to hear any emphatic denouncements from them or their parties.
A few weeks ago, in one of our editorials, we suggested that parties sign on to a code of conduct heading into the so-called “silly season”. To date, we’ve heard of no such commitment or intention.
It is every citizen’s right to support the party or candidate of their choice – and to vote for that individual on election day. That right must be respected, cherished and protected.
Saint Lucia’s Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to vote, based on the principle of universal adult suffrage. Its preamble affirms a commitment to democracy, particularly a government freely elected by citizens 18 years and older.
The Constitution also guarantees freedom of association, protecting the right to assemble and form associations, including trade unions and political parties.
It explicitly states: “a person should not be hindered in their right to associate freely, including forming or joining trade unions, political parties, or other associations.”
While there are limitations – for reasons such as national defence, public safety, public order, public morality, public health, or to protect the rights and freedoms of others – the power to enforce those limitations does not rest with any individual.
If someone believes they’ve been aggrieved or that another’s expression of rights infringes on theirs, they should seek redress through the proper channels.
We must always operate within the law. It is the duty of the police to ensure that our laws are upheld without fear or favour. The media, too, must play their part by calling out unsavoury acts and promoting a peaceful election process.
We believe it is incumbent on all political leaders and candidates to uphold these principles and lead by example.
As the campaign continues, let us be more circumspect in what we do and say.
Let us operate with civility in this zone of peace – before, during, and even after the final vote is counted.
Incidentally, the election date falls on the second day of Advent, a Christian season of waiting and preparation, reflecting on the birth of Jesus, the Prince of Peace.
May that peace be the thread that runs through this season and beyond.
If we truly profess to be a Christian society, let our conduct reflect it, not just in word, but in deed.
