Weekend Edition

stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

Opposition Leader backs tax amendments but cautions against eroding middle class

Opposition Leader Allen Chastanet has welcomed the Government’s latest tax amendments, but cautioned they must not come at the expense of the middle class.

He was responding in the House of Assembly on Tuesday to the tax measures presented by Prime Minister and Minister for Finance Philip J Pierre, including a motion to approve the Value Added Tax (VAT) Alteration of Rate of Interest Order. That order reduces the rate of interest on tax payable that is not paid by the due date. The Government has also proposed waiving the penalty for unpaid VAT. Prime Minister Pierre also presented the Income Tax Amendment Bill.

“The Government tried its best to relieve the burden of taxation on the public of Saint Lucia, even when the public was at fault, in that they did not pay things like the VAT,” he told the House. Pierre explained that allowances, previously capped at $30 000, have now been increased to $40 000.

In his response, Chastanet noted that the amendments stemmed from proposals contained in the Saint Lucia Labour Party’s 2021 manifesto.

“I remember sitting on the opposite side at the time when that proposal was made and I knew as a minister of finance that if, in fact, that  was to go through, that would have eliminated almost 50 per cent of the people who currently pay income tax from having to pay income tax,” the Member for Micoud South stated.

According to him, the government later realised the cost implications of that proposal and adjusted it accordingly.

“They amended it to now what we’ve seen today,” he said.

Chastanet argued that the middle class would be most affected by the changes and cautioned against policies that could weaken that group.

“They are the ones who are going to suffer, and they found themselves substantially worse off with that amendment,” he said. “The Government was forced to make this further amendment based on the pressure that was being brought to bear upon them and to understand the mistake that was made and the negative impact it was going to have.”

Chastanet also called for discussion on the United Workers Party’s proposal for a $2 500 base salary for tourism workers. He credited former Prime Minister Dr Kenny Anthony with removing taxes on gratuities earned by tourism workers but noted that high operating costs continued to burden hoteliers.

He stressed that the middle class drives economic growth and the government should be implementing policies to grow that segment of the population.

“It is that middle class that’s going to generate the level of growth that we want to see,” Chastanet said. “It is the middle class that can afford to build their own homes and to save the money.”

He further accused the government of preparing the country for higher taxation, pointing to repeated statements by the Prime Minister that Saint Lucia’s tax threshold is lower than the average.

However, the opposition leader commended the government on the tax amendment, stating that the original threshold was inflexible and too much of a burden.

So I applaud the government. Bravo that you’ve come to the House and you’ve made that amendment and given relief to the middle class of this country. But I’m going to say there needs to be more introspection in the upcoming budget as to what is going to happen to Saint Lucia,” he stated.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

285
Immigration

Will you be affected by the US visa freeze?

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.