Police Commissioner Crusita Descartes Pelius has confirmed that an investigation is underway into the leakage on social media of an internal Royal Saint Lucia Police Force (RSLPF), document highlighting death threats against officers.
“It’s a serious matter and of course, it cannot go by unnnoticed. It is under investigation,” the Police Commissioner told reporters., adding that ‘appropriate action’ would be taken.
However, Pelius would not be drawn into revealing whether the probe was internal or involved outsiders.
The leaked internal police document outlined measures to address the threats against officers and contained photographs of alleged members of a named gang.
The Police Commissioner said other organisations need to take such leakages seriously.
Pelius, whose current one-year contract ends on August 31, spoke regarding succession.
“We are working on that and this you will know in due course,” she stated.
In addition, she responded to whether she would wish to continue in the position.
“I have worked hard for Saint Lucia and I am satisfied with what I have done for this country,” the Police Commissioner declared.
Pelius is Saint Lucia’s first female top cop, with over three decades of service to her credit.
Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate.
St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.
Even a blind man is able to see where and an idiot knows who leaked those documents. This is basically a list of targeted individuals which officers have drafted up. We all know what they plan on doing with it
Among a thousand may found one honest !
Money says :
Earn me forget everything !!!!!
Every police organization has a list of persons that present very dangerous threats to society. It is sometimes referred to as a “Rogues List or Rogues Gallery.” It has been around from the mid eighteen hundreds. Why have a dossier? Simple point, the compiled information needs to be updated constantly. Example, if the criminal changes address or they die; maybe the criminal is incapacitated. The list constantly changes to reflect reality. Because your politician cannot discern a Rogues List from a death list, should be an indicator of their abject stupidity. The state of New York probably has one of the biggest Rogues List. Each person in the gallery has a mugshot, methods of operating (signature), friends etc. in their profile.
Those guys making terroristic threats against the police are sure to be on their Rogues List. Dare to think?
Whoever is responsible for leakage of such sensitive information need to be made an example. This doesn’t happen often in policing.
@ Poule Foo totally agree. One’s arrogance will lead to his downfall
@Poule Foo, I totally agree. If your name is on that list, check your life and change your ways beuase the cops been looking at you. Good to know the RSLPF has an intelligence unit and they are doing the do. Now, find the idiot who leaked the document and deal with him. This leak should violate professional standards.
And what about the other serious matter right in the highest office within the RSLPF. Does it not warrant some form of investigation too?
Again as I have said and continue to say there is a ton of double agents amongst the rest of the officers so nobody knows who is who but that been said the police have an idea who is behind those threats so the should remove those gloves and deal with them beside a country with no law and order is not country at all so if we want to have a country we must make sure there is law and order and those who working against it should be dealt with now
“leakage on social media of a… document highlighting death threats against officers”
“The lady doth protest too much, methinks!” The logic for the hullaballoo (ro-ro) escapes me! To me, it would be more logical for the list to be publicly broadcast, far & wide, as a deterrent to would-be assassins of police, and for the ultimate (boosted) protection of the officers under threat; except, of course, if the top brass in the police force are under orders (from the SECRET CABAL controlling St. Lucia society) to allow for the lethal sanctions to be completed successfully.
Then, the police force could not be held responsible for the deaths on the list; the cabal would escape suspicion, completely, for the murders; and some “bottom-feeder” (per Country Man) criminals (who were contracted for the killings) would be blamed, then killed by designated police assassins, doing their sworn duty, doncha know? NO LOOSE ENDS!
My observations were strongly supported by the quick response in the comments, to claim that the list is one of individuals targeted by the police, and not a list of threatened police, as indicated in the article, itself.