stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

Chastanet Challenges SLP On CIP, Infrastructure Programme

At a recent United Workers Party (UWP) briefing, opposition leader Allen Chastanet responded critically to the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) administration’s recent defending statements and current handling of the Citizenship by Investment Program (CIP), voicing concerns over transparency and accountability.

During last week’s Sitting of the House of Assembly, Castries South MP and Investment Minister Dr. Ernest Hilaire delivered an impassioned defense of the current administration’s CIP operations.

However, Chastanet characterised Hilaire’s approach as “cowardly,” expressing dissatisfaction with the format in which the minister addressed the allegations against him and other officials.

“Instead of holding a major press conference, where he could have delivered the statement he gave in the house, and then allowed reporters and maybe even people from civil society to have been there to question him, instead he chose the cowardly way of dealing with this issue,” Chastanet said.

He criticised Hilaire’s choice to use a ministerial statement at the House’s opening, pointing out that this approach left no room for immediate response or questions. “While the Minister is giving his speech there are to be no interruptions and no questions are allowed to be asked… That’s why I call it the cowardly way of dealing with this issue.”

Chastanet also raised concerns about transparency in the SLP administration’s handling of CIP-related funds.

He argued that the public was not adequately informed about the administration’s infrastructure plans and noted that details in a September 12 Gazette publication were unclear.

The September 12, 2024, Gazette in question announced approval of two projects: “Caribbean Galaxy Real Estate Limited – National Infrastructure Improvement Program” and “Bemax LLC – Rock Hall Housing Development Project.”

However, Chastanet questioned the sufficiency of the information presented in the Gazette.  “What you’ve put in the gazette still does not satisfy the legislation,” he stated, adding that specifics on the scope, costing, and contractual terms of the infrastructure projects were absent. “What roads? What bridges? What are they building? Who has done the costing? Where’s the contract between Galaxy and the government of Saint Lucia?”

He continued, expressing concerns about transparency in the Rock Hall housing project. “We hear about Rock Hall, all you gazetted was the name Rock Hall. How many houses? How much are the houses going to cost? Who, at the end of the day, is going to own the houses? How are those persons going to be selected?” Chastanet questioned, emphasising that the public cannot assess the project’s value without further information on its costs.

Meanwhile, Minister Hilaire, who delivered a nearly hour-long ministerial statement at last week’s House, largely in defense of the SLP administration’s handling of CIP, also presented data on government earning and expenditure from the 2022 – 2023 CIP report.

Hilaire noted that the CIP unit is preparing the 2023–2024 CIP report, which he planned to present to the House.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

2 COMMENTS

  1. DONT USUALLY DO BUT FOR ONCE I TOTALLY AGREE WITH CHASTANET. THERE’S NO SPECIFICS ON THE ROCK HALL PROJECT AND WHO ARE THE BENEFECIARIES OF SAID PROJECT, MOREOVER IT GIVES THE IMPRESSION CIP MONEY GETS SPENT ON PIERRE CONSTITUENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Share via
Send this to a friend