The Leader of the Opposition has, on behalf of the people of Saint Lucia, scored a victory over a flawed Parliamentary procedure related to the Speaker of the House, Claudius Francis’ handling of the Privileges Committee.
On Monday October 25th 2022, the High Court ordered that the Defendant, Mr. Claudius Francis, in his capacity as Chairman of the Privileges Committee, is restrained from conducting any business of the Privileges Committee with regard to the referrals that were made by him on the 11th day of October, 2022 to the Privileges Committee in respect of the complaints made against the Claimant, the Honourable Allen Chastanet by Honourable Richard Frederick and the Honourable Ernest Hilaire, respectively, such complaints forming part of present proceedings for injunctive relief until the determination of the claim for relief under the Constitution.
Prior to yesterday’s claim for injunctive relief, by letter dated 19th October to the Honourable Speaker of the House, Legal Counsel for the Opposition Leader highlighted the flaws in the process that would infringe the rights of the Leader of the Opposition under the Constitution.
Instead of taking the advice in good faith, in his reply dated 20th October the Speaker chose to double down and formally notified the Opposition Leader’s attorney at law that there was nothing wrong the process which is largely governed by the Standing Orders and the House of Assembly (Privileges, Immunities and Powers) Act Cap 1.08 and refused to cancel the scheduled meeting.
Counsel for the Leader of the Opposition then filed a claim with the High Court asking for declarations from the Court that the Speaker did not have the power to refer the complaint, that the referrals were unconstitutional, null and void or alternatively violated the Claimant’s rights under the Constitution, and for an injunction to prevent the flawed process from moving forward.
Prior to hearing the claim for injunction against the Speaker, Counsel for the Speaker’s attorney admitted the process was indeed flawed, the motion having not been passed in the House, and the Speaker would be willing to withdraw the proceedings and abandon the scheduled hearings.
Counsel for the Leader of the Opposition submitted that the Speaker had no power to ‘withdraw’ the matter as he had initiated a formal process of the House, though procedurally and constitutionally flawed and the purported referral was a nullity.
The Claim for an injunction against Mr. Francis, in his capacity as Chairman of the Privileges Committee was then heard by the Court and injunctive relief was granted to the Claimant, the Honourable Allen Chastanet.
Determination of the substantive issues of the Claim will be heard at a later date and the matter was adjourned to 1st and 2nd December 2022.
The Leader of the Opposition has vowed to continue to seek proper Parliamentary procedure and to stand up for justice and guard against those who would use power in an attempt to silence the people.
SOURCE: Office of the Leader of the Opposition
Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate.
St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.
By the way, Monday was October 24th and not October 25th.
Poor jab!!
When some people have no idea of their own rules and laws!!
Because, they do not read!
There are more than one way to skin a yellow Johncrow.
SMH. No wonder Kenny eh wanna be part a minister and under dem fellas. The only persons who don’t realise the arrogant, self-centered, nature of these guys are party hacks. With those guys as leaders Crime will not be reduced. Impossible.
Is there a reason why it is not possible to comment on the article about the Castrues and Soufriere ports being sold off to Friends family and foreigners! Lol!
Why were the people of the country not informed of this selloff of our payrimony by the SLP?
Why has this not been brought to Parliament with the terms of the MOU?
So after the barrage of racism and xenophobia of the SLP’s covid period elections campaign NOW all the country’s ports are being sold to foreigners. Hewanorra, Castries, Soufriere.
Where are our intellectuals (?) or vocal detractors as the SLP are doing the very thing they complained about for 5 years?
But maybe that is a good thing. Maybe foreigners can kickstart a moribund econony that Lucians are incapable of doing? The same foreigners of FFF fame.
We are very short term in this country. Lucians will be very happy when the period of development takes place for the short term and it is only after , as in other countries, they will realized their country has been sold out for a generation. There goes the “yuff” economy! What a laugh!
We are in interesting times.
Remember Claudius FAILED the bar exam MORE than once
Our leaders should understand that they are not to tell lies so blatantly. If what Chas said about Richard and Hilaire are lies, he should admit and face the consequences.
Any fool knows that to control a country, first you make them sell or “rent” their ports and airports to you so that you can control them for a good 50 -100 years. when you control a country’s port, you control the food supply coming in and going out and you also control the people going in and out. This is what has happened in Sri Lanka. when they could not pay the Chinese moved in to control. Now what have the fools / A-holes in the SLP done with all the ports?
He was perfectly named by his parents Claude de Ass, don’t mind the English spelling Claudius. I don’t know why the man thinks that he is an authority on every subject. He is among a handful of people who have studied law unsuccessfully yet he thinks he knows and is above the law. I told friends based on what an SLP lawyer friends of mine told me that Claudius would fail miserably with that previlege committee hearing and it was not surprising to hear his own counsel declare that the whole process was flawed. Why does Pierre have such a baffone as speaker of our house of assembly. Lord help our leader be a leader and not a puppet.
Them politician will take three to four years to correal with each other and to get back at each other and the people and the development of the country is being left behind no progress nothing for the people when the thief year Is about to approach they turn back and asked the people to give them a second chance to do this and do that and to better thier lifelyhood s tired of this crap no vision no leadership divide and rule what did I voted for progress development salary increase better education better health care plans for the years to come ect
So criminals in the labour party trying to go after ChasTANET!! LUCIANS REALLY WITHOUT SHAME!!