stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

spot_img

WHO Urges Countries To Save Lives By Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages

spot_img

On Tuesday, the World Health Organization (WHO) released its first-ever global tax manual for sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs).

And the world body urged countries to introduce or increase taxes on those items to save lives.

“Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages can be a powerful tool to promote health,” Director of Health Promotion at WHO, Dr. Ruediger Krech, noted.

Krech explained that the taxes save lives and prevent disease while advancing health equity and mobilising revenue for countries to realize universal health coverage.

Currently, at least 85 countries implement some SBB taxation.

And according to WHO, SSB, tobacco and alcohol taxes have proven to be cost-effective ways of preventing diseases, injuries, and premature mortality.

WHO also observed that SSB taxes could encourage companies to reformulate their products to reduce sugar content.

“Regular consumption of SSBs, including soft drinks, flavoured milks, energy drinks, vitamin waters, fruit juices and sweetened iced teas, is associated with an increased risk of dental cavities, type 2 diabetes, weight gain and obesity in both children and adults, heart disease, stroke and cancer,” according to a WHO release.

The release said evidence shows that implementing taxes on SSBs increases product prices and reduces demand, resulting in fewer purchases.

It disclosed that a one-time global SSB tax increase that raised prices by 50% could generate additional revenues of US$1.4 trillion over 50 years.

In this regard, WHO has called on countries to introduce or increase existing SSB taxes to raise the prices of ‘these unhealthy products’, lessen demand, and reduce consumption.

Headline photo courtesy Evieanna Santiago (Unsplash.com).

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

4 COMMENTS

  1. how the hell can putting Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages can be a powerful tool to promote health. i can understand you trying to say hey cut on the sweet drinks but in code this looks like you are more saying hey they drinking alot of this lets put a heavy tax so we can make more money on their heads. People have been told to stop smoking have you seen this decrease as well? No people still smoke so what makes this any different?

  2. @ma malay if lucians smart enough they wont buy it…am telling u now i was drinkin alot of that and eating alot of kfc and trust me that didnt get me on the good health side…its time we start cooking home and doin little things at home……u care wen they make more money?? u are the ones making them make the money….i ban them tingz papa

  3. The initiative is damn good . If an increase in cost can effect a reduction in consumption, that automatically saves lives no matter the rate of reduction. Think out of the box.

  4. SmH…..if people are addicted to sweet things,they will pay more. This will do nothing to prevent anything. Use your head people.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Share via
Send this to a friend