stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados


loop news st lucia, the loop st lucia, loop st lucia, st lucia loop news online, st lucia news online today, st lucia, st lucia news, stlucia news, st lucia news online, stlucianewsonline, st. lucia news online, st lucia breaking news, stlucianews

Chastanet Accuses PM Of Misleading Statements Regarding The John Compton Dam Desilting

Join Our WhatsApp Channel

Get news updates directly on your mobile device through WhatsApp

- Advertisement -
Prime Minister Pierre continues to mislead the public, this time on the John Compton Dam Desilting Project.
These are the facts:
1) The Desilting program of John Compton Dam started in 2020 under the United Workers Party administration
2) Accurate information regarding the expenditure and scope of the project is available at WASCO, the NURC (National Utilities Regulatory Commission), and the Caribbean Development Bank to challenge any wrong assumptions.
3) The Dam was heavily silted due to lack of maintenance and weather events. This includes (Tropical Storm Debbie in 1994, Hurricane Tomas in 2011 and the Christmas Eve trough in 2013)
4) The Silt from these weather events displaced almost 400 million gallons of water. The total capacity of the dam allows for the storage of a total of 700 million gallons
5) The Lower extraction port was compromised, which posed continuous risks to water security.
6) Dredging can only occur during rainy months of June to November given that the Suction dredge extracts 70% water and 30% silt. You cannot dredge the dam continuously in any one year as doing so would deplete it of water supplies.
7) Silt settles in Sediment Disposal Area downstream, while water is treated and distributed.
8 ) The project was tendered under the previous SLP administration in 2016 and on both occasions were unsuccessful.
9) The previous SLP administration had secured the services of a Canadian company Golder and Associates as consultants for the project. We kept this same company.
10) Two separate contracts were engaged; one to build the Sediment Disposal Area one mile downstream of the dam and another for the leasing services of a suction dredge to commence the desilting process to clear the lower port and extract just below 100,000 cubic meters of silt.
11) The sediment disposal area contract was tendered amongst local contractors and a local contractor was the lowest responsive bidder. Due to the specialized nature of the dredging works this was tendered regionally and internationally with funding secured from the Caribbean Development Bank. Vinci Construction Maritime et Fluvial a subsidiary of the world’s second largest construction company Vinci Construction was the most successful bidder for the dredging works.
12) The NURC and CDB both oversaw the project to monitor progress and expenses.
13) The Project costs fell below the NURC’s capped amount of $60 million.
14) Every financial disbursement had to be vetted by the both the NURC and CDB before payment was made to the contractors.
15) Caribbean Development Bank no objection certificates were also obtained before payments could be made to the dredging contractor.
16) When the UWP left office in 2021, the were still funds from CDB loan for this project available.
17) At the closing ceremony for the desilting project, the CDB commended Wasco and the then Government of St Lucia for the successful completion of this highly technical and engineering works in this part of our hemisphere.
Prime Minister Pierre and his administration must stop playing politics with the lives and livelihoods of Saint Lucians.
There is an urgent need to continue maintenance and desilting of the dam to prevent further silt accumulation and ensure water security.
SOURCE: United Workers Party
- Advertisement -
Editorial Staff
Our Editorial Staff at St. Lucia Times is a team publishing news and other articles to over 200,000 regular monthly readers in Saint Lucia and in over 150 other countries worldwide.

Please note that comments are being moderated. When commenting, please remember: 1) be respectful of all, 2) don't make accusations or post anything that is unverified, 3) don't include foul language, 4) limit links, 5) use words not volume, 6) don't add promotional content. Comments that do not meet the above criteria or adhere to our "Commenting Policy" will not be published.


  1. “The sediment disposal area contract was tendered amongst local contractors and a local contractor was the lowest responsive bidder.”

    UW-Pee why not name the local contractor? ‘Mega Contracting Inc’ Gale’s uncle.

  2. You see yol two idiots…stop! It’s time we lucians file a class action law suite against WASCO and the government for this “dam desilting” charge on our water bill. This is wrong…you cannot charge people for your operational failures. Besides….our two so leaders by this article admit that our money collected each month from Wasco were squandered !!!Mary Francis I need you to sue them for infringing upon my rights!

  3. Yes the dam needs desiling, but it became even more urgent when Allen Chastanet gave away our birthright for DHS. A planned project of that magnitude would have required ‘a greater water source ” same for CABOT it’s about everyone else needs not St Lucians so he can chat his usual jibberish. To the he untrained school of thought and belief of Allen Chastanet trickle down economics 101 here my dear I present to you Dubai will ALWAYS get suckered in. Not this time sucker many of us are WOKE and will remain AWAKE, you can fool some people sometimes but not all of the people all the time.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Share via
%d bloggers like this:
Send this to a friend