stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

spot_img

Gros Islet Minibus Association Has ‘No Major Concern’ Over Movement Detected At Choc Bridge

spot_img

The President of Gros Islet Minibus Association has disclosed that the association has no major concern regarding the Choc Bridge, where the Ministry of Infrastructure has detected some movement.

“For now I don’t think my members have any concern,” Danny Edward told St. Lucia Times.

Edward noted that the Choc Bridge is a significant link to the North of Saint Lucia.

As such, he said he was confident that the authorities would address any issues with the structure.

“So for me and the members, I do not think there is any major concern at this point,” the Association President stated.

He did not think the bridge issue would negatively impact  Gros Islet minibus drivers who cross the structure daily.

On Tuesday, Infrastructure Minister Stephenson King disclosed remedial work would be done to address the movement detected at the Choc Bridge while asserting that there was no ‘extreme danger’.

The former Prime Minister revealed that the Ministry had completed the necessary investigation and assessment and was preparing to implement ‘intermediary’ measures.

King explained that implementing the measures would be in preparation for reconstructing the Julian R. Hunte Highway.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

3 COMMENTS

  1. Engineer King speaks….just like Engineer Joseph used to do! Since bus drivers are airing their no concern , maybe I should air mine as well like the multiple sinkholes infront of la place carenage.

  2. This bridge was built back somewhere in 1971 or 1972 I remembered that well around same time the corinth secondary school.was built and anyone who have an idea of road construction would know that’s its of very poor quality I can’t see this structure still standing after 52 later and shame on that Canadian company that put up that bridge this kind of structure is only suitable for haul/ access road that can be use for a couple years so shame on the canadian contractor to present this a bridge to the ministry of communication. And shame on the MC&W for acceepting as a permanent structure on their roadway

  3. We must remember how far we have come within the last fifty years. We as a country in seventies was very poor. Very few areas on the island pipe water or roads. The journey from Vieuxfort to Castries and back was a major under taking requiring lots of planning by families to maximise the benefits of the trip. Like wise getting from Gro Islet and other northern areas.
    The then country with little resources embark on improvements hence the various culvert bridges was used. It was never meant to be permanent structures and for the volume of traffic that uses it today.
    It is failure of planning and execution by various ministers not renew or replace ad long as it is still functioning that continues to bring us to these brink of total collapse.
    Another is the so call international airport in vieux Fort that has now outlived it life span twice over and today we are still fighting over a new airport wasting money on consultants and keep pushing the can down the road instead of being decisive. That is we culture yellow and red.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Share via
Send this to a friend