stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados


Search Continues For Missing Guyana Army Helicopter With Seven On Board


Guyana’s Army Chief Omar Khan has said there was no information of Venezuelan involvement in a Guyana Defence Force (GDF)Helicopter that went missing.

“We have no information to suggest that,” Khan stated in response to a reporter’s question whether he had assurance that Venezuela had not taken the aircraft out of the sky.

He said the GDF had rescue missions in the same area where two aircraft were flying.

“We do not have information suggesting there were any flights by Venezuelan aircraft in that area,” Brigadier Khan told a news conference.

He said he was confident that the missing helicopter crew considered all ‘safety parameters’.

Khan also said there were no safety issues with the aircraft.

The missing soldiers were on a mission to visit troops on Guyana’s western border.

Tensions between Guyana and Venezuela have been rising over a border controversy.

Venezuela claims over two-thirds of Guyana’s territory, comprising the resource-rich Essequibo region.

The Bell 412 Army helicopter lost signal about 30 miles from Guyana’s borders near Venezuela.

News about the missing helicopter with seven soldiers on board broke about midday on Wednesday.

The Guyana Army Chief described them as among the army’s best.

Brigadier Khan acknowledged that the helicopter’s disappearance had triggered additional anxiety ‘in this period that we are in’.

A massive search and rescue operation was underway to find the missing aircraft and its occupants.

The army suspended the operation on Wednesday due to bad weather and would continue the search on Thursday.

Brigadier Khan said he remained optimistic, and the morale of troops on the border was high.

Headline photo: Six of the seven missing soldiers.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website ( in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.


  1. Sounds like the typical false flag by the US. Casus belli, anyone? Gulf of Tonkin, redux, almost 60 years later? Right out of the play-book of the CIA!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Share via
Send this to a friend