stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados


Pierre Urges Peaceful Settlement Of Guyana-Venezuela Border Controversy


Citing Saint Lucia’s close friendship with Guyana and Venezuela, Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre Monday described the border controversy between the two neighbours as a quarrel between Saint Lucia’s friends while urging a peaceful settlement.

“It’s a situation where we find ourselves among a quarrel among our friends and that is the reality of the situation,” Pierre told reporters on the margins of a Cabinet meeting.

“But again, we believe that controversy must be settled peacefully,” the Prime Minister told reporters.

“We are calling for discussion and dialogue,” Pierre explained.

“We are asking for both parties to respect international law,” he said.

Pierre recalled Guyana saying it would accept the International Court of Justice (ICJ) jurisdiction, but Venezuela has not.

Pierre also stated that actions should not escalate the border controversy.

In addition, he urged maintaining the region as a zone of peace.

Pierre said he was pleased about a Thursday meeting between Presidents Irfaan Ali and Nicolas Maduro in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

On Sunday, former Commonwealth Secretary General, Guyana-born Sir Shridath Ramphal, warned against false expectations.

Ramphal emphasised the need to understand the limit of the talks.

The former Commonwealth Secretary-General observed that Caribbean Community (CARICOM) leaders were aware that the Guyana-Venezuela matter was before the ICJ, the proceedings of which could not be compromised.

As a result, he noted that the regional leaders had called for ‘appropriate dialogue’ between the Guyana and Venezuela leaders to ensure peaceful co-existence, respect for international law, and avoiding the use or threats of force.

“There was no call for a discussion of the Venezuela controversy over the Essequibo region of Guyana,” Ramphal stated.

For his part, Guyana’s President Irfaan Ali has reiterated that Guyana’s land boundary is not up for discussion, as it is before the ICJ.

Ali said when adjudicated, Guyana would fully respect the outcome.

“The President, on numerous occasions, has made it explicitly clear that the case before the ICJ will not be an issue for bilateral discussions,” a statement on Ali’s Facebook page declared.



Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website ( in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.


  1. The opposition leader has asked the government to make a statement on the border dispute between Guyana and Venezuela. Now that the prime minister has called for a peaceful resolution through dialogue I would expect the demagogue, Chastanet, to call for war. Let us all ask for cooler heads to prevail in this border dispute.

  2. The PM’s clarification on his previous statement is even more concerning. There should be no ambiguity, Venuzuela is acting illegally and is challenging the sovereignty of Guyana and by extension Saint Lucia. His attempt and some of the other Caricom leaders to appease Maduro because of their “personal relationship” is threatening Caricom’s our own security by inviting other more powerful countries to challenge our sovereignty. Given the aggressive and unprovoked actions of Venuzuela and the statements by the President of Guyana, does anyone expect either side to back down? Saint Lucia should have made a strong unequivocal statement to Maduro that we stand with Guyana and they should stand down until the Court has given its final decision. The proposed meeting on Thursday should be to reinforce the need for both sides to wait for the Courts decision and to accept the outcome peacefully. This statement would be even more meaningful given the SLP’s relationship with Venuzuela. It’s not to late for the PM to do the right thing and stand strong with Guyana and all Guyanese citizens. Saint Lucia’s commitment to democracy and the rule of law and our own integrity demands nothing less.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Share via
Send this to a friend