Weekend Edition

stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Union Leader Urges Stronger Advocacy on AI at May Day Rally

Trade unions must modernise and aggressively advocate for workers’ rights in the face of rapid artificial intelligence (AI) adoption, Trade Union Federation (TUF) President Julian Monrose declared during the May Day Rally at the Vigie Sports Complex on Thursday.

Delivering his address under this year’s theme, Revolutionising Health & Safety: The Role of AI and Digitisation at Work, Monrose acknowledged fears that AI could displace jobs but insisted unions cannot resist progress.

“We must recognise that the world is moving in a direction that we cannot hold,” he said. “Our responsibility is to recognise the issues and advocate for the rights of workers to be respected regardless of the situation.”

He called for unions to embrace digital transformation while pushing for stronger safeguards, including updated legislation and collective bargaining agreements that address AI’s impact.

Part of the gathering at the May Day Rally.

Reflecting on Labour Day’s significance, Monrose saluted workers’ contributions and the ongoing fight for better conditions. He acknowledged progress, such as the government’s establishment of a dedicated labour tribunal.

“We trust that this will help with the timely dispensation of justice, with issues arising from the workplace,” he said.

The struggle for decent work and social justice continues, Monrose insisted, adding that every Labour Day, unions must assess how far they’ve come and what remains to be done.

Closing with a call for solidarity, he urged workers to unite as “they are all in the same struggle”.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

6 COMMENTS

  1. I am convinced that union leaders are themselves the most insensitive to the plight of regular union members. They perpetuate the same undemocratic workplaces found in private enterprises & governmental departments where a minority at the top dictate the terms & conditions of employment for the majority of workers.

    The result is the periodic bloviating on offer from union leaders about current affairs (in this instance, the perceived impact of AI in the workplace); to detract from their mis-leadership in regards to their presumed adversarial relationship with leaders of private enterprises and government.

    What is stopping union leaders from instituting programs to train their membership in the use and application of the “new tool”, AI, to ameliorate their working conditions and significantly increase their productivity? They could then be better placed to insist that their membership deserved a larger portion of the profits of the enterprises or reduced working hours.

    If their demands to private enterprises are then not met, unions should demand that government make it easy (legislation instituting concessions & subventions) for union members to form cooperative (democratic) enterprises to directly compete with predatory private enterprises.

  2. Is this gentleman the TUF President and also employed full-time with the Civil Service Association on its monthly payroll? Is this not a conflict? So if there are issues within the CSA, how can he be impartial from the TUF standpoint? Is there a lack of manpower in St Lucia where the Trade Union is concerned? Why can’t we groom younger people and pass the torch to them? Same Sh– different day.

    Inquiry minds want to know please

  3. Nudge, you hit the nail on the head. Nothing more to say, except that the Union does not need to have any “adversarial ” relationship with the government or private sector employers. The Union should not be at war with employers except when they break the law and do not recognize the rights of workers.

    What we have from Union representatives now is guys most of whom are already retired from government positions) trying to solidify themselves in posts in the Secretariats, as if they didn’t know that they had to save their money to retire comfortably when they got to that age.

    It is more about them and their bread and butter than the members they purportedly are supposed to be representing.

    I said what I said!

  4. @Mwen Même: You do not understand “capitalism” if you hold the view that unions “should not be at war with employers” except for the instances when employers break the law & do not recognize the rights of workers. Your naivety is so glaring, it hurts!

    Tell me! Have workers ever been directly consulted concerning laws that were supposedly passed for their benefit? Consulted about what their rights as workers entailed? Honest answers from you will reveal that employers have always held sway over any labour laws instituted or any enumerated rights for workers; so that they can maximize their profits by minimizing the wages and rights of workers.

    That has always been the case – during feudalism; slavery; & now capitalism.

    If you have neglected your history lessons, I implore you to bring yourself up-to-date regarding worker issues by picking up a copy of Dr. Eric Williams’ timeless book, Capitalism and Slavery. You might then have a chance of deprogramming yourself of all the brainwashing propaganda you have been subjected to up to the present time from corporate media; yes, another group which gets paid to forsake it adversarial role against governments & predatory capitalists!

    And if you want to fully understand the capitalist system, you should pick up Dr. Richard D. Wolff’s book titled, Understanding Capitalism!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Share via
Send this to a friend