Weekend Edition

stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Saint Lucia Defers Landmark Energy Bill for Further Review

The Saint Lucian government has decided to delay a major piece of legislation aimed at transforming how the country keeps the lights on.

The second reading of the Electricity Supply Bill was deferred in parliament this week. The proposed law is designed to be a cornerstone of Saint Lucia’s renewable energy future, formally opening the electricity generation market to independent power producers working with sun, wind, and other clean sources.

Explaining the decision to pause, Minister for Infrastructure Stephenson King told his parliamentary colleagues that key stakeholders had asked for more time to digest the complex draft legislation.

“This piece of legislation is an important, landmark legislation that we must channel and pilot through the parliament,” King told MPs, adding that the delay reflected “transparency, tolerance and understanding” by the government, and “to be able to work together with the general public”.

The existing utility, LUCELEC, remains at the heart of the transition. Its national grid – the transmission and distribution infrastructure – will remain central and unchanged, as the government believes the local market is too small to support competing grids.

The minister recalled that the journey to this point began in 2013 and saw significant progress in 2016 with legislation, introduced under then-minister Dr James Fletcher, that “ended the 80-year monopoly that LUCELEC previously enjoyed for the generation of electricity”. 

That earlier reform created the National Utilities Regulatory Commission (NURC) and set the stage for independent producers to enter the field, though LUCELEC retained its monopoly on transmission and distribution.

The current bill, he explained, is the product of years of consultations, technical studies and reviews by government agencies, regional experts and international partners. Among the organisations involved were the World Bank, USAID, the Global Green Growth Institute and Germany’s development agency GIZ.

An independent review commissioned by the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB) confirmed that the bill aligned with international frameworks for transitioning to a renewable energy-based sector.

Despite this thorough process, Minister King revealed that last-minute requests for more time had come in, notably from the Saint Lucia Chamber of Commerce.

“Only last night Mr Speaker,” King said, “I had the opportunity of speaking to James Fletcher, [who is now the CARICOM Climate Envoy], after receiving a number of calls, an opportunity to speak with the Chamber of Commerce, who’ve asked that they would need an extra two weeks, just to consolidate their thoughts on the bill. A number of other individuals have sent messages asking for time to consolidate their thoughts on the legislation.”

While public meetings on the bill saw low turnout, the minister emphasised that private sector bodies had been engaged throughout the drafting process.

King reaffirmed his belief that the act would ultimately “revolutionise the energy sector”, consolidating old laws in the process. He then formally proposed that the debate be postponed, promising to bring the landmark bill back for consideration “at a next, or subsequent sitting of the house”.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.