stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

CPEA under scrutiny: Parents and teachers voice concerns

Every year around this time, people take a closer look at the Caribbean Primary Exit Assessment (CPEA). The Caribbean Examination Council (CXC) introduced it in some countries as early as 2012 to replace the old Common Entrance exam. The goal was to better assess students before they move on to secondary school. In Saint Lucia, this change took full effect in May 2022, ending one system and starting a new one.

Traditional primary exit exams only looked at final results. The CPEA includes ongoing assessments to help students learn as they go. It was designed to reduce the stress of a single big test and to get students and parents more involved. However, many people say it has not worked out as planned.

Every year, people on social media and in public talks say that the CPEA may have gone too far and brought new problems. Many students are said to feel burnt out by the time they start Form One.

Teachers also say that many students are less ready for secondary school work than before. Some students lack the basic reading, writing, and math skills they need.

To learn more about the issue, St. Lucia Times spoke with different people involved. One primary school teacher, who asked not to be named, said the workload felt “similar to my master’s degree”.

“Five essays, a book report, one project, eight teacher-made tests, four student-made tests, all of which need to be completed in Grade 6, is too much.”  ​

Parent Claudine Louison, whose child is now in Form 2, said that even though the assessment is strict, it does not really help students move smoothly from primary to secondary school. She added that even students who do well, often because of intensive drilling in primary school, still face problems when they reach secondary school.

“It is very stressful, and honestly, I don’t believe it is fair to the students and teachers, because, basically, you are being graded off a sample of work from other students and the multiple choice exams,” she said. ​

“You can’t really tell whether the students have really understood what was taught. When they get the nice grades and go to secondary school, it shows that the basic concepts weren’t understood, making it more difficult for the secondary school teachers, because these children are not ready for secondary school.”  ​

These worries are not just in Saint Lucia. Teachers in other countries feel the same way. One teacher in Grenada said the CPEA does not help students grow, especially because of its focus on multiple-choice questions.

“I believe that CPEA is crippling our students and is not allowing them the opportunity to think critically. It also hinders their literacy abilities to write and express,” she said. “Yes, the internal component is there, but they get feedback from peers and teachers. With Common Entrance, it truly tests their ability.”​

“I believe learning loss is the issue. After the exam, both teachers and students should engage in schoolwork, not as heavy as before, [which] keeps the students engaged. Teaching students only to pass an exam is another issue all by itself. I refuse to do that. Secondary school also comes with maturity and students’ ability to be disciplined.”  ​At a pre-cabinet press briefing on Monday, May 18, Minister for Education Kenson Casimir acknowledged that while the examination structure must be constantly reviewed and adjusted to best suit students, the move away from a single exam determining aptitude was progressive and aligned with the realities of the working world.  ​

“I can tell you that I am not one who gravitates towards just examinations. I believe we need, from that age, to be dealing with children as developing professionals, and education should always be life-forming in terms of transitioning children through the phases in terms of their adopting life skills that can be sustained through their employment, that could be sustained in terms of them being individuals in our society that is progressive and providing that level of economic activity for the wider nation.”  

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

472
Water

Have you been affected by recent water disruptions?

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.