stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

Motie’s fifer not enough as New Zealand clinch series in Sobers tribute ODI

The West Indies narrowly lost a low‑scoring thriller against New Zealand at the Kensington Oval in Barbados on July 19. The One Day International was played in a sombre and respectful atmosphere, as both teams honoured the life and legacy of West Indian and Bajan legend Sir Garfield Sobers, who died on Friday. Fans were able to attend the match for free.

The West Indies continued to struggle with the bat after New Zealand captain Mitchell Santner chose to bowl first. Ackeem Auguste worked hard for his 33 runs from 50 balls, but after he was out, the Windies were in trouble at 62 for 4. Things got worse as they slipped to 81 for 6, but an 81-run partnership between Gudakesh Motie (41) and Amir Jangoo (51) helped double the score. The Men in Maroon were eventually bowled out for just 188.

With a modest total on the board, the West Indies needed wickets early and often. The first came with no runs on the board, as Matthew Forde removed Henry Nicholls for a duck. Wickets continued to tumble, and the West Indies had the Kiwis in trouble at 77 for 4. A 65‑run fifth‑wicket stand between Michael Bracewell (32) and Mark Chapman (80) provided much‑needed backbone for the chase. The partnership was eventually broken by Gudakesh Motie, who claimed a five‑wicket haul, finishing with 5 for 47.

Wickets in hand proved decisive as the Kiwis survived and scraped home by one wicket, winning the series as well.

The West Indies still have a lot at stake, as they aim for direct qualification to next year’s 50-Over World Cup. To avoid the tough World Cup Qualifiers and the chance of missing a second straight World Cup, the team must win most of their matches before the March 2027 deadline.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

690
Water

Have you been affected by recent water disruptions?

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.