stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

WATCH: Pierre Says No Tax For Government Contracts Valued $10,000 Or Less

The government of Saint Lucia, led by Prime Minister Hon. Philip J. Pierre, will NOT TAX any government contract with a value $10,000 and below.

Before Prime Minister Pierre took Office, all government contracts were subject to a 10% income tax deduction.

Prime Minister Pierre has intervened. New legislation has passed to increase profitability and keep more money in the pockets of small contractors.

SOURCE: Office of the Prime Minister

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

8 COMMENTS

  1. Has anyone noticed that this SLP government does not talk about sustainable economic development.
    No word about increased tourism or job creation. Everything about taxes and borrowing by this government.
    Did we have as many cruise ships as 2019? Are our stayover arrivals recovered as yet from the major pandemic that killed millions? The same pandemic that the SLP fought the UWP while they were trying to right the ship.

    All we hear is borrowing and taxation into the hundreds of millions even as citizens cannot pay bills and food bills are ravaging the country.
    You cannot run a country on taxes and borrowing which the SLP have done everytime and bankrupted the country.
    They are still playing the same old song!

  2. Ant, if the 863 million dollars borrowed by the previous government had been put into good use, today you would have the audacity to talk about taxes raised by this government.

  3. ANT
    We need excercise objectivity in our remarks. If we initially mis managed the country’s finances what is expexted in order to return to economic recovery?
    Its a step by step process. What i have seen so far is a focus on the construction industry which touches a large percentage of the economic workforce.
    The tourist dollar does not impact every one therefore impacting other sectors remain critical.

  4. The 10% was withholding tax which could have been claimed back on Tax Returns at the end of the year. Anyways, it’s just that these decisions seem to come out of nowhere. So many small contracts are being given out to cut grass and clean drains. These ppl which are plenty are saying the 10% is eating into their profit so King and PJP say stop it so we can plz those many voters who depend on small jobs from their Rep. NO sound economics behind any decision. Anyways.

  5. So only one set of people have to pay tax in this country? The same set of people that use private insurance (i.e. not a burden on government). The same set of people likely to not cause a problem in society. Why is that one bunch of people keep getting all the benefits and another have to sustain it?

  6. There seems to be no coherent strategy with this government. Just adhoc fly by night decisions to benefit a minority.

    Remove $8.5million in subsidies on flour which would have kept the price of bread low for all yet foregoing revenue which could have allowed continuation of the subvention to the benefit of the majority.

    Record cost of fuel and record revenue raised on fuel tax yet allow bus fares to increase for the majority when they could have reduced the tax and allow bus fares to remain low. I don’t get it.

    Meanwhile increased consultancy allocation in their budget so moneys can be funneled to party loyalists for whom public service posts cannot be created through “contracts”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

629
Water

Have you been affected by recent water disruptions?

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.