stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

Concacaf rejects FIFA commercial proposal

Concacaf has formally rejected FIFA’s proposed US$20 billion FIFA Forward Enterprise, citing serious concerns over the lack of consultation, governance and due process surrounding the initiative.

The confederation’s decision follows an emergency meeting of its membership, during which delegates criticised FIFA’s handling of the proposal, including what they described as an artificially short timeline for approval and the absence of review by the governing body’s relevant decision-making bodies.

FIFA president Gianni Infantino has issued a mid-September deadline for the 211 member federations of the global governing body to sign off on a scheme that would inject US$20 million into the development programmes of each national governing body. The catch would be the requirement to sell minority stakes in the commercial rights of the FIFA World Cup to private equity investors

On Wednesday, European governing body UEFA and the confederation for Central America, North America, and the Caribbean, Concacaf, both expressed their displeasure about the lack of consultation before FIFA dropped the proposal on their members. The two confederations represent a combined total of 96 national federations.

But what started as administrative friction has since escalated, with UEFA taking a far stronger stance. It drew a line in the sand on Thursday with an historic ultimatum – a total boycott of all FIFA competitions should the FIFA Forward Enterprise proposals remain on the table.

Across the Atlantic, following an emergency conference, Concacaf delivered a pointed rejection of the scheme. The Victor Montagliani-led organisation minced no words regarding the absolute bypass of administrative transparency.

“During the meeting, the membership expressed deep concerns about the lack of due process surrounding the proposal, the artificially short deadline imposed, and the absence of any review or approval by the relevant FIFA governance bodies,” said a Concacaf statement on Thursday.

The confederation dismissed out of hand the financial justification for bringing in external private equity, especially on the heels of the massive financial success enjoyed by the FIFA World Cup, hosted across three Concacaf territories,

“The need for private equity investment to fund new and existing FIFA Forward programmes following the most profitable FIFA World Cup in history was questioned.”

Concacaf concluded by saying they have rejected the FIFA Forward Enterprise proposal; tasked FIFA vice-president Montagliani and FIFA Council Members, including Barbados’ Randy Harris, with engaging FIFA to determine how existing reserves can help increase development funding; and tasked Council Members to instruct Infantino to ensure that any matter follows the proper governance processes, in accordance with the FIFA Statutes.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

747
Water

Have you been affected by recent water disruptions?

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.