stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

spot_img

UWP Women’s Arm Warns Of Protests Over Inaction On RSLPF Sexual Harassment Allegations

spot_img

The women’s arm of the opposition United Workers Party (UWP) has warned of protests over the failure of a high-ranking police officer to step aside or be removed from his position to allow a probe into sexual harassment allegations.

“We will protest,” Attorney at Law Jeannine Giraudy-McIntyre declared in a message on behalf of the UWP women announcing the measures that failure to act would attract.

“We will take all necessary measures to ensure that our top cop is a man of integrity, a man in whom we can repose faith and confidence. We are of one mind in this,” the former UWP Castries North candidate stated.

“We are of unwavering determination and together we are an unstoppable force,” Giraudy-McIntyre asserted.

She explained that Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre was responsible for placing the high-ranking police officer in the position.

But she observed that the Police Welfare Association sent copies of letters from the alleged victims to the Prime Minister before the appointment.

Giraudy-McIntyre described the allegations against the officer as damning.

“Philip J. Pierre flings his hands in the air and says in a pitiful and helpless voice: ‘What can I do about it?” She stated.

In this regard, the UWP women’s arm spokesperson urged Pierre to require administrative leave for the officer until an independent probe clears him of the allegations.

The former Senate President vowed that females would not sit back and allow ‘this travesty against women.’

“We refuse to accept this in 2023,” Giraudy-McIntyre said.

“We women refuse to allow the progress that we have made over all these years to be undermined by recklessness, cowardice and inaction,” she observed.

And she questioned whether the Prime Minister understood the power of women.

“We will rise up from every walk of life and make our voices heard. We will stand united on an issue that affects every woman in our society – mothers, grandmothers, sisters, and daughters. We stand with those brave female officers – our sisters who are immensely fearful of the repercussions of speaking out,” she said.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

3 COMMENTS

  1. In the absence of a sexual harassment policy, I’m still lost for words as to what exactly will be the outcome of having the commissioner step aside for an investigation; and at the end of the investigation. Seems to me that the commissioner has been judged already based on the tone of the UWP comments.
    Also, I need some clarification from the police welfare association as to what was cc to the PM and Home Affairs Minister; was it letters from the alleged victims or a letter from the Association’s President. Based on what UWP said it was letters from the alleged victim(s). I’m of the view that if the victims wants redress that they make a formal complaint to the Police Complaints Unit and seek legal advice.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Share via
Send this to a friend