From Evidence to Misinformation: Policing In The Age Of Social Media In Saint Lucia

A recently retired member of the Royal Saint Lucia Police Force (RSLPF) has raised concerns about the growing influence of social media on police investigations, warning that its misuse could jeopardise the legal process.

Speaking to St. Lucia Times on the condition of anonymity, the retired officer highlighted how platforms like Facebook and WhatsApp, while valuable, can also complicate efforts to solve crimes.

The officer’s comments come amidst an ongoing investigation into a fatal daylight shooting at Derek Walcott Square in Castries.

“This investigation is a very complicated one because of what has happened in terms of social media,” remarked Assistant Commissioner of Police Luke Defreitas

Despite the RSLPF’s acknowledgment of “unidentified complications” hampering the case, images of two individuals on a motorcycle have circulated widely online, with some social media users alleging they are the culprits.

“Social media has become a double-edged sword for police investigations in Saint Lucia and the Caribbean,” the retired officer stated.

On one hand, platforms enable police to swiftly share updates, seek public assistance, and alert communities about crimes or missing persons. On the other hand, the rapid dissemination of information can hinder investigations, with suspects monitoring posts to evade capture or false narratives sowing confusion.

“In small, interconnected communities, these challenges are even more pronounced,” the former officer noted. “Social media is also a valuable tool for gathering evidence, as posts and videos often reveal key information about crimes or suspects. Yet, legal issues like privacy and challenges with verifying content can complicate its use.”

The officer emphasised that viral social media posts can shape public opinion prematurely, sometimes unfairly implicating individuals without due process. This, in turn, can lead to vigilantism or threats against the wrongfully accused.

“Once someone’s image is shared online with accusations, the damage to their reputation can be irreversible—even if they are later proven innocent,” the officer warned.

Additionally, the public spectacle surrounding high-profile incidents can discourage witnesses from coming forward, especially in cases involving fear of retaliation. Mistrust of law enforcement, amplified through online discourse, further exacerbates the issue.

The retired officer called for greater public awareness about the responsible use of social media in the context of criminal investigations.

“People need to understand that while sharing information can help, it can also harm. Investigations require careful, methodical work, and spreading unverified claims or images can derail that process,” the officer stated.

Attorney at Law Kenroy Justin says the implications for courts dealing with cases and evidence discussed on social media are multifaceted and raise both procedural and ethical challenges.

“Public discussions on social media can expose jurors to opinions, evidence, or details not allowed in court, potentially biasing their judgment.”

According to Justin, widespread coverage of a case can create preconceived notions among potential jurors, making it harder to panel an impartial jury. Additionally, Courts must ensure that social media content presented as evidence is authentic, accurately sourced, and unaltered.”

He adds that social media posts can raise concerns about hearsay, as the originator of a statement might not be available to testify or cross-examine.

The RSLPF has not commented directly on the viral images related to the Derek Walcott Square shooting, but the incident highlights the challenges of policing in the digital age.