stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

Pierre: Cabinet to consider Joy St Omer inquiry request, but no decision yet

Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre says Cabinet will today consider a request from the family of the late Joy St Omer for an independent Commission of Inquiry, stressing that the Government has neither accepted nor rejected the proposal.

“We have not said no. We have not said yes,” Pierre told reporters at the pre-Cabinet briefing on Monday morning.

The Prime Minister said the request was received shortly before Cabinet met last week.

“That request came to me on Monday morning at 20 past ten in the morning, and the Cabinet met at 11,” Pierre said.

Pierre said establishing a Commission of Inquiry requires careful Cabinet consideration and cannot be reduced to an immediate yes-or-no decision.

“A Commission of Inquiry is not something that I can just say yes or no,” he said. “I just want to make it clear that the Government is very concerned as to the circumstances that surround all deaths.”

Several ministers were away on Monday, and Pierre said he did not have a full Cabinet present. Nevertheless, he said Cabinet would consider the request.

Asked when the family and wider public could expect a decision, he indicated that the process could take up to two weeks.

According to Pierre, even if Cabinet makes a decision on the matter immediately, it would still have to go through the necessary ratification process before it could be formally announced.

“If a decision is made today, it’ll be ratified next week,” he explained.

He said the time required for the process should not be interpreted as a lack of urgency or concern.

“It’s not because we’re tardy, not because we do not care, but because there are processes, because Cabinet decisions are important decisions, they have repercussions,” Pierre said.

He added that the Cabinet must be given sufficient time to consider all relevant factors before reaching a final position.

The St Omer family formally petitioned the Governor General last week, under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, seeking an independent examination of the systems and institutions that responded to Joy’s requests for help before her death.

The family has made clear that it is not seeking an inquiry into the criminal case arising from the 24-year-old’s death, which is before the courts. Instead, it wants the proposed inquiry to examine the institutional response, including the handling and enforcement of protection orders, communication between agencies and procedures for dealing with domestic and gender-based violence cases.

Pierre said that if the circumstances surrounding St Omer’s case point to a need for changes to existing systems or processes, his administration would act.

“If the circumstances warrant any changes in the system, in the processes, the government will surely initiate it,” he said.

The Prime Minister also rejected any suggestion that his administration had been indifferent to the circumstances surrounding Joy’s death.

“I wanna say to you that the Government did not sit idly by and allow this young lady to lose her life,” Pierre said. “It’s something that we’re very concerned about.”

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

837
Water

Have you been affected by recent water disruptions?

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.