stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

UWP convention still up in the air as Chastanet faces leadership questions

Nearly six months after United Workers Party (UWP) political leader Allen Chastanet said the party would complete an internal review of its performance following the last general election, the party is still working through that process. It has also yet to set a date for its convention.

But Chastanet says the delay is not a sign that nothing is happening behind the scenes. Instead, the UWP is grappling with a bigger question: should it address weaknesses identified during the review first, or hold its convention and implement the changes afterwards?

Responding to a question from St Lucia Times about where the review now stands, when supporters can expect a convention and whether the party is falling behind, the UWP political leader acknowledged that “there are clearly things…within the party that we need to look at”.

“You need to get buy-in to what that change is going to be. And that’s what the party’s process is right now,” he said at the party’s press conference on Tuesday, noting that change within any organisation can be difficult. 

Back in March, Chastanet told St Lucia Times that the UWP was undertaking a review following its election defeat and expected the process to take about six months. At the time, he also indicated that the party’s convention would ultimately settle the question of its leadership. 

With that timeline now approaching, Chastanet said several important meetings are expected to help determine what happens next.

“There will be a couple of critical meetings coming up to make a determination. Do we go and have a convention earlier and have a staged process to the changes we think that the party thinks needs to be taking place? Or do we make the changes and go to the convention afterwards?”

A decision, he said, should not be far away.

“I think that that decision will be made in the upcoming weeks,” Chastanet said.

He rejected the suggestion that the party has been inactive while supporters await clarity on its next steps.

“I think it’s unfair to say that the party’s doing nothing. The party is extremely active,” he said.

However, Chastanet acknowledged that he would like to see greater activity at the grassroots level.

“I’d like to think that there was more work taking place on the ground,” he said.

There is also another issue hanging over the process, and Chastanet did not shy away from it: his own leadership.

“There’s significant questions about my leadership. And that’s fair. That’s a fair question,” he said.

Chastanet suggested that uncertainty over the leadership can make some people reluctant to fully commit to moving forward with organisational changes. 

Despite the challenges, he maintained that the UWP remains a strong political organisation, while acknowledging the need to rebuild public confidence following its election defeat. 

“I will accept that we have to do more to build up people’s confidence in the party,” Chastanet said. “And that is why this part of the process is so important that you get it right.”

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

838
Water

Have you been affected by recent water disruptions?

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.