stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados

UWP sustains pressure on Frederick and SSDF, calls for Board to resign

The United Workers Party (UWP) is asking whether the public has been told the full story about why Housing Minister Richard Frederick was suddenly placed on administrative leave, as questions continue about the Saint Lucia Social Development Fund (SSDF).

Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre announced on Monday that Frederick would step away from Cabinet and his ministerial duties “until further notice”, saying the move was intended to ensure transparency and remove any suggestion that the minister could influence the process surrounding the SSDF. Pierre also made it clear that the decision should not be seen as an admission of guilt on Frederick’s part.

But the opposition is not buying that explanation, suggesting there may be more behind Frederick’s leave than the Prime Minister has revealed.

For that reason, UWP member Titus Preville on Tuesday called for the Prime Minister to “launch a formal independent investigation into the SSDF”.

“We ask that the investigation should be conducted by a team of investigators with the requisite experience, independence and capacity,” Preville told a UWP press conference.

He said the investigation should not be conducted in “secret”, and called for its terms of reference, particularly its scope, to be made public.

To help with the process, Preville asked for the SSDF’s Executive Director and board to step aside.

He descibed the request as a “normal expectation” in situations like this. Drawing on a similar argument to the one Pierre used in sending Frederick on administrative leave, Preville said removing the board and Executive Director would avoid any suggestion that they could influence the investigation.

The UWP is also proposing that both the Government and Leader of the Opposition should help decide the terms of reference for any independent investigation.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

TRENDING

867
Water

Have you been affected by recent water disruptions?

Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.