stluciatimes, caribbean, caribbeannews, stlucia, saintlucia, stlucianews, saintlucianews, stluciatimesnews, saintluciatimes, stlucianewsonline, saintlucianewsonline, st lucia news online, stlucia news online, loop news, loopnewsbarbados


Chastanet Chides SLP Over Lack Of Consultation On Important Matters


Opposition leader Allen Chastanet has accused the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) government of a lack of consultation on significant matters after the Suppression of Escalated Crime (Police Powers) Bill went to Parliament on Thursday.

The Micoud South MP disclosed that the government gave the opposition just a few hours to review the measure.

“What happened to all the consultation that the SLP promised you?” He stated.

And he declared that the SLP’s lack of consultation on critical matters was a growing trend.

The former Prime Minister said the Suppression of Escalated Crime (Police Powers) Bill was ‘littered with concerning clauses.’

And he warned that, left unchecked, the clauses would affect personal and civil liberties.

The bill provides the police with expanded powers to respond to areas where crime has escalated.

Its creation recently followed a deadly gun violence spike in Vieux Fort.

During the debate on the new bill, Chastanet told the House that the government had access to other mechanisms, namely a state of emergency for which the constitution requires transparency and accountability.

But he observed that ultimately, the Minister of National Security is responsible for all the actions in the escalated crime bill.

Headline photo: Stock image.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website ( in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate. St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.


  1. Has Chastanet forgotten that the government has declared an oath to serve the constitution and not the opposition’s ludicrous assertions? A 15 to 2 win at the polls gives this coalition government almost absolute power to govern this country based on the constitution. If Chastanet had governed St. Lucia better he wouldn’t have faced such humiliating and ignominious defeat at the last elections. He would undoubtedly still have some credibility. All he does now is engaged in childish accusations, innuendos, and conjectures. He should first try to understand the language of the constitution and build a cogent and coherent argument. There is enough ambiguity in the language of the constitution to leave it open to several interpretations but it must make sense.

    Chastanet’s interpretations and arguments are usually sophomoric and disjointed. For example, he is calling for a broad state of emergency rather than the targeted Suppression of Escalated Crime Bill. A state of emergency would place the entire country under siege whereas the current bill is designed to stop an anarchic and bitter gang war in a given locality.

    The deliberate spewing of falsehoods by the leader of the opposition isn’t meant to win any battle of ideas. Instead, its goal is to prevent the actual battle of ideas from being fought. How can the leader of the opposition be so shallow and baseless in his arguments? It’s a rhetorical question, however, his popularity in the UWP rests solely on demagoguery. His authoritarian streak has become more prominent lately.

  2. Chastanet seems to have forgotten what he said when Labor was in opposition. He said slp had lost their voice and anything they say was of no significant value. So why he has to be consulted now?

  3. This is the same person that said in the Parliament the opposition have lost their right to talk when they lost the 2016 election when he was Prime Minister?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Subscribe to our St. Lucia Times Newsletter

Get our headlines emailed to you every day.

Share via
Send this to a friend